REACH

Emma L. Jackson, Louise C. Boardall, Zameer Qureshi, "Top Questions for Substance Information Exchange Forum (SIEF) Participation," Elements, the Magazine of Chemicals Northwest, Summer, 2016.

The global chemicals industry has been presented with significant, often unfamiliar, challenges by the concept and functioning of SIEFs under REACH.  Through years of experience in SIEF participation on our clients’ behalf, Acta has identified the following questions to consider when participating in a SIEF.

Ruth C. Downes-Norriss, Leslie S. MacDougall, "What is Happening with Chemical Regulation Outside of the European Union?," Elements, the Chemicals NorthWest Magazine, Autumn 2015.
Gyöngyi (Pearl) Németh, M.Sc., Leslie S. MacDougall, "The Next Step for REACH: Lessons Learned and Tips for Success Regarding Authorisation," Elements, The Chemicals NorthWest Magazine, Spring, 2015.

As all chemical companies doing business in the European Union (EU) should know, the "A" in REACH stands for Authorisation, the last of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) processes to be implemented since the regulation entered into force in 2008. This article reviews the path to Authorisation and reports on key developments shared during the "Lessons Learnt on Applications for Authorisation" ECHA conference held 11 February, 2015. 

Lynn L. Bergeson, "Evolving Global Chemical Management Programs and Why They Matter," Trends, the ABA Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Newsletter, November 2014.

Chemicals play a central role in our personal and professional lives. As consumers, we focus keenly on the chemicals in the products we use and with which we come into contact. Globalization and the emergence worldwide of sophisticated chemical management programs invite complex legal, commercial, and scientific challenges. These challenges extend far beyond compliance questions that, by comparison, seem now nostalgically straightforward. Understanding these programs and their evolution can only help inform our judgment as lawyers, consultants, and educated consumers.

Lynn L. Bergeson, "ECHA Report Includes Recommendations for Exposure Assessment and Risk Characterization of Nanomaterials under REACH," Nanotechnology Now, March 28, 2014.

On March 26, 2014, SAFENANO announced that the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) published a report entitled Human health and environmental exposure assessment and risk characterization of nanomaterials: Best practice for REACH registrants.

Ruth C. Downes-Norris, Leslie S. MacDougall, Gyöngyi (Pearl) Németh, M.Sc., "Think REACH Does Not Apply to Your Company? Are You Certain? Read On," Elements, The Chemicals NorthWest Magazine, Spring, 2014.

According to the study, Impact of REACH on SMEs in the Netherlands, commissioned by the Dutch Ministry for Infrastructure and the Environment, 23% of SMEs belonging to the chemical industry are not aware that they do, in fact, have obligations under REACH. A company does not need to be an SME, however, to have the false impression that it has no obligations under REACH. This article outlines frequent misconceptions regarding REACH obligations and provides guidance to help confirm whether companies have responsibilities under REACH.

Bergeson & Campbell, P.C., "Comments on K-REACH and Lessons from EU REACH," Compliance & Risks Connect, July 2013.

As with many countries, Korea is pursuing a chemicals management approach that ensures substances being placed on its market are assessed for risk potential based on its use patterns while placing the burden of safe use on chemical businesses.

Lynn L. Bergeson, "EC Begins Consultation on the REACH Annexes on Nanomaterials," Nanotechnology Now, June 26, 2013.

On June 21, 2013, the European Commission (EC) began a consultation on the modification of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) regulation annexes on nanomaterials. According to the EC, the objective of the initiative is to provide further clarity on how nanomaterials are addressed.

Lynn L. Bergeson, "EC Posts Assessment of Consequences of Changing the REACH Requirements for Nanomaterials," Nanotechnology Now, May 29, 2013.

In May 2013, the European Commission (EC) posted a January 2013 report entitled Examination and assessment of consequences for industry, consumers, human health and the environment of possible options for changing the REACH requirements for nanomaterials. According to the report, 12 of the 21 originally suggested options are considered already implemented with existing legislation and guidance. The other nine options were considered relevant for an adaptation of the Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and thus build the basis for the assessment.

Lynn L. Bergeson, "Comment on Regulating Industrial Chemicals: Lessons for U.S. Lawmakers From the European Union's REACH Program," Environmental Law Reporter, November 2012.

It is entirely appropriate to consider how REACH may influence reconsideration of the U.S. chemical regulatory environment, and the report provides some critical insights. But REACH is not the only consideration — Canada’s Chemical Management Plan should be considered as well. Further, REACH should be considered from a practitioner’s, not an academic’s, perspective to learn lessons relevant to U.S. chemicals management 

 1 2 >  View 10 | 25 | 50 | 100 per page
 
THE ACTA GROUP
Beijing, China | Manchester, U.K. | Washington, D.C.
 
Contact | Twitter | Legal Disclosures | Privacy
©2017 The Acta Group All Rights Reserved.